… Section 23 of the Contracts Act, because the agreement was an agreement to stifle criminal prosecution. This altercation was carried out in this way by… Similarly, the question of whether the agreement itself indicates that it was a stifling crackdown. The decision is… Section 23 of the Contracts Act is the cancellation of the loan. Counsel argued that the loan was executed to stifle prosecution and aggravate a misdemeanor… However, a contract that requires only legal benefit. B of each game, such as the sale of decks of cards to a known player in which gambling is illegal, is applicable. However, a contract directly related to the gambling law itself, such as the repayment of gambling debts (see the case close), does not meet legal standards of applicability.

Therefore, an employment contract between a blackjack dealer and a talkeasy manager is an example of an illegal agreement, and the worker is not validly entitled to his wages if gambling is illegitimate under that jurisdiction. When a person enters into an agreement that requires him to do something that goes against his or her public duty, the agreement is not enforced because of public order. Because z.B is an agent`s agreement to obtain secret profits, because it is contrary to public order. Similarly, an agreement by a government official to acquire land in his circle is illegal, contrary to public policy. Similarly, an agreement to pay money to the parent/caregiver of a minor, taking into account his or her assumption of giving to minors in marriage, is not entitled, as it is contrary to public policy. Agreements on the use of the influence of corruption in obtaining government jobs, titles or honours are illegal and therefore unenforceable. Indeed, if such agreements are valid, corruption will increase and lead to the inefficiency of public services. It should be noted at this stage that, although an agreement for marriage is inconclusive, the marriage will be a valid marriage. …: “The Director General of Public Policy” covers a wide range of topics such as trade with the enemy in times of war, asphyxiation of prosecutions, control and maintenance, and…

In simple terms, pubic policy refers to the policy of the government for the good of society, It can also be said that if an agreement against a developed interest of society or morals of the time, it can be said that against public order and the agreement will be considered invalid. It was held that an agreement could not be applied if it was contrary to the public interest [ii] or contrary to general legal policy. In the case of P. Rathinam v. Union of Idnia[iv], the Supreme Court has decided that the concept of public order is open to change and enlargement An illegal agreement under the common contract law, is one that the court will not enforce, because the purpose of the agreement is to obtain an illegal end. The illegal purpose must result from the performance of the contract. The classic example of such an agreement is a murder contract. Example: a paid B, a civil servant a certain amount of money that encourages him to withdraw from the service, thus paving the way for the appointment of A in his place.